4.5 Article

Fetal growth is directly related to maternal anthropometry and placental volume

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 58, 期 6, 页码 894-900

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601909

关键词

maternal weight; maternal weight gain; fetal anthropometry; placental volume

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To describe the influence of maternal weight and weight gain, placental volume and the rate of placental growth in early pregnancy on fetal dimensions measured sonographically. Design: In a prospective study, 712 women were recruited from the antenatal clinic of the University Hospital of the West Indies. Data analysis was confined to 374 women on whom measurements of the placental volume at 14, 17 and 20 weeks gestation were complete. Measurements of maternal anthropometry and fetal size ( by ultrasound) were performed. Weight gain in pregnancy between the first antenatal visit ( 8 - 10 weeks) and 20 weeks gestation, and the rate of growth of the placenta between 14 - 17 and 17 - 20 weeks gestation were calculated. Main outcome measures: Fetal anthropometry ( abdominal and head circumferences, femoral length, and biparietal diameter) at 35 weeks gestation. Results: Lower maternal weight at the first antenatal visit was associated with a significantly smaller placental volume at 17 and 20 weeks gestation ( P<0.002 and <0.0001 respectively). In all women, maternal weight gain was directly related to fetal anthropometry. Placental volume at 14 weeks gestation and the rate of growth of the placenta between 17 and 20 weeks gestation were significantly related to all four fetal measurements. Conclusion: This study has provided evidence that both placental volume, and the rate of placental growth may influence fetal size. These effects are evident in the first half of pregnancy, and appear to be mediated through maternal weight and weight gain. Sponsorship: This study was supported by a grant from the Wellcome Trust, 183 Euston Road, London, England.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据