4.6 Article

Abnormal rotational knee motion during running after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
卷 32, 期 4, 页码 975-983

出版社

AMER ORTHOPAEDIC SOC SPORT MED
DOI: 10.1177/0363546503261709

关键词

knee; anterior cruciate ligament (ACL); kinematics; reconstruction; running

资金

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR 46387] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The effectiveness of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for restoring normal knee kinematics is largely unknown, particularly during sports movements generating large, rapidly applied forces. Hypothesis: Under dynamic in vivo loading, significant differences in 3-dimensional kinematics exist between anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees and the contralateral, uninjured knees. Study Design: Prospective, in vivo laboratory study. Methods: Kinematics of anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed and contralateral (uninjured) knees were evaluated for 6 subjects during downhill running 4 to 12 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, using a 250 frame/s stereoradiographic system. Anatomical reference axes were determined from computed tomography scans. Kinematic differences between the uninjured and reconstructed limbs were evaluated with a repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results: Anterior tibial translation was similar for the reconstructed and uninjured limbs. However, reconstructed knees were more externally rotated on average by 3.8 +/- 2.3degrees across all subjects and time points (P = .0011). Reconstructed knees were also more adducted, by an average of 2.8 +/- 1.6degrees (P = .0091). Although differences were small, they were consistent in all subjects. Conclusions: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failed to restore normal rotational knee kinematics during dynamic loading. Clinical Relevance: Although further study is required, these abnormal motions may contribute to long-term joint degeneration associated with anterior cruciate ligament injury/reconstruction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据