4.7 Article

Brain perfusion in children: Evolution with age assessed by quantitative perfusion computed tomography

期刊

PEDIATRICS
卷 113, 期 6, 页码 1642-1652

出版社

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.113.6.1642

关键词

child; brain maturation; brain perfusion; psychomotor development, CT; perfusion CT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. The objective of this study was to assess the age-related variations of brain perfusion through quantitative cerebral perfusion computed tomography (CT) results in children without brain abnormality. Methods. Brain perfusion CT examinations were performed in 77 children, aged 7 days to 18 years. These patients were admitted at our institution for both non-contrast and contrast-enhanced cerebral CT. Only children whose conventional cerebral CT and clinical/radiologic follow-up, including additional investigations, were normal were taken into account for this study (53 of 77). Results. The average regional rCBF amounts to 40 (mL/100 g per minute) for the first 6 months of life, peaks at similar to130 (mL/100 g per minute) at similar to2 to 4 years of age, and finally stabilizes at similar to50 (mL/100 g per minute) at similar to7 to 8 years of age, with a small increase of rCBF values at similar to12 years of age. The rCBF in the gray matter averages 3 times that in the white matter, except for the first 6 months of life. The global CBF represents 10% to 20% of the global cardiac output for the first 6 months of life, peaks at similar to55% by 2 to 4 years of age, and finally stabilizes at similar to15% by 7 to 8 years of age. Specific age-related evolution patterns were identified in the different anatomic areas of the cerebral parenchyma, which could be related to the development of neuroanatomic structures and to the emergence of corresponding cognitive functions. Conclusions. Quantitative perfusion CT characterization of brain perfusion shows specific age variations. Brain perfusion of each cortical area evolves according to a specific time course, in close correlation with the psychomotor development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据