4.6 Article

Gene therapy of rat malignant gliomas using neural stem cells expressing IL-12

期刊

DNA AND CELL BIOLOGY
卷 23, 期 6, 页码 381-389

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/104454904323145263

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Primary malignant brain tumors have a poor prognosis. This report investigates the potential for gene therapy of experimental brain tumors using neural stem cells (NSCs) expressing IL-12. In this study NSCs were isolated from the hippocampi of 3-5-month human embryos and used for lipofectamine mediated transfer of the IL-12 gene. Positive clones of anti-G418 were obtained and were proliferated in culture and expression of IL-12 was demonstrated by RT-PCR. For the in vivo studies three groups of rats were used and stereotactic injections were made into the striatum. In the first group C6 tumor cells were injected, in the second C6 cells and hNSCs. IL-12, and in the third C6 cells on Day 0 followed by hNSCs. IL-12 on day 5. The growth of the resulting tumors was monitored by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and after sacrifice by immunohistochemistry. Rats injected with C6 cells and hNSCs. IL-12 had a significantly prolonged survival. Injections of hNSCs. IL-12 were also made into established gliomas. The survival time was also significantly prolonged compared to controls. MR imaging demonstrated that there was initial growth of tumor followed by shrinkage and then disappearance. After sacrifice, tumor areas were studied by histochemistry. NSCs were often seen intermingled with tumor cells, particularly when they had been injected into established tumors; they were also present at the boundaries of the tumor mass. The immunohistochemical analysis showed that these infiltrates were mostly constituted by CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-lymphocytes, the CD8(+) being more numerous than the CD4(+). These findings indicated that NSCs engineered to release IL-12 could have a strong antitumor effect. Neural stem/precursor cells could be useful vectors in genetic approaches to brain tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据