4.7 Article

Exergetic and economic comparison of ORC and Kalina cycle for low temperature enhanced geothermal system in Brazil

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 52, 期 1, 页码 109-119

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.11.012

关键词

Thermodynamic analysis; Kalina cycle; Organic Rankine cycle; Enhanced geothermal system; Working fluids; Ammonia-water mixture; Exergy; Levelized electricity cost

资金

  1. Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education (CAPES)
  2. National Council of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq)
  3. Foundation for Research Support of Minas Gerais State (FAPEMIG)
  4. AES Tiete Company

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper deals with the thermodynamic analysis, of both the first and second law of thermodynamic of two different technologies, (ORC and Kalina cycle) for power production through an enhanced geothermal system (EGS). In order to find a better performance of both thermal cycles it were evaluated 15 different working fluids for ORC and three different composition of the ammonia-water mixture for the Kalina cycle. In this work, the Aspen-HYSYS software was used to simulate both thermal cycles and to calculate the thermodynamic properties based on Peng-Robinson Stryjek-Vera (PRSV) Equation of State (EoS). At the end the two cycles was compared using an economic analysis with the fluid that offers the best performance for each thermal cycle which are R-290 for ORC and for Kalina cycle a composition of the mixture of 84% of ammonia mass fraction and 16% of water mass fraction. For this conditions the Kalina cycle produce 18% more net power than the ORC. A levelized electricity costs of 0.22 (sic)/kW h was reached for ORC and 0.18 (sic)/kW h for Kalina cycle. Finally a sensitivity analysis of the EGS LCOE was carried out for a few economic parameters to determinate how is the variation of LCOE for a % change from the base case. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据