4.6 Article

Pseudomonas aeruginosa with LasI quorum-sensing deficiency during corneal infection

期刊

INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE
卷 45, 期 6, 页码 1897-1903

出版社

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.03-0980

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE. To understand the importance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing systems in the development of corneal infection, the genotypic characteristics and pathogenesis of seven ocular isolates with low-protease and acyl homoserine lactone (AHL) activity and quorum-sensing mutants of PAO1 deficient in lasI, lasR, or rhlR were investigated in the study. METHODS. The possession of the quorum-sensing genes lasI, lasR, rhlI, rhlR, and the quorum-sensing controlled genes lasB, aprA, and rblAB in the clinical isolates were determined by polymerase chain reaction and Southern blot hybridization. Elastinolytic activity, controlled by the las system, was assayed using elastin Congo red and rhamnolipid production controlled by the rhl system was assessed using agar plates containing methylene blue/cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide. Induction of keratitis was examined in a scarified inbred BALB/c mouse model. RESULTS. The clinical isolates Paerl and -3 were lasI and lasR negative, and the isolates Paer2 and -4 were rhlR and rhlAB negative. The isolates Paer17, Paer26, 6294 and 6206 possessed all the genes examined. There was no rhamnolipid production in clinical isolates Paer2 and -4. The isolates Paerl and -3 were virtually avirulent in the scarified mouse corneas. Using isogenic PAO1 mutants, strain lasI showed a markedly reduced virulence in the corneal infection model. The remainder of the clinical isolates and the lasR or rhlR mutant strains caused severe keratitis. CONCLUSIONS. These results indicate that quorum-sensing deficiency may occur naturally in clinical isolates, and the possession of lasI and hence a functional Las quorum-sensing system may be important in development of corneal infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据