4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Angiotensin II increases Pax-2 expression in fetal kidney cells via the AT2 receptor

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 1452-1465

出版社

AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000130567.76794.58

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL 48455] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although both the renin angiotensin system (RAS) and the paired homeobox 2 gene (Pax-2) seem critically important in renal organogenesis, whether and how they might interact has not been addressed. The present study asked whether a link between the RAS and Pax-2 exists in fetal renal cells, speculating that such an interaction, if present, might influence renal development. Embryonic kidney explants and embryonic renal cells (mouse late embryonic mesenchymal epithelial cells [MK4] and mouse early embryonic mesenchymal fibroblasts [MK3]) were used, Pax-2 protein and Pax-2 mRNA were detected by immunofluorescence, Western blot, reverse transcription-PCR, and real-time PCR. Angiotensin II (AngII) upregulated Pax-2 protein and Pax-2 mRNA expression via the AngII type 2 (AT(2)) receptor in MK4 but not in MK3 cells. The stimulatory effect of AngII on Pax-2 gene expression could be blocked by PD123319 (AT(2) inhibitor), AG 490 (a specific Janus kinase 2 inhibitor), and genistein (a tyrosine kinase inhibitor) but not by losartan (AT(1) inhibitor), SB203580 (specific p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor), PD98059 (specific MEK inhibitor), SP600125 (JNK inhibitor), and diphenyleneiodonium chloride (an NADPH oxidase inhibitor). Moreover, embryonic kidney explants in culture confirmed that AngII upregulates Pax-2 gene expression via the AT(2) receptor. These studies demonstrate that the stimulatory effect of AngII on Pax-2 gene expression is mediated, at least in part, via the Janus kinase 2/signal transducers and activators of transcription signaling transduction pathway, suggesting that RAS and Pax-2 interactions may be important in renal development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据