4.8 Article

Role of PLZF in melanoma progression

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 23, 期 26, 页码 4567-4576

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207597

关键词

PLZF; homeobox gene; cDNA expression array; melanoma; tumor progression

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger (PLZF) protein has been described as a transcriptional repressor of homeobox (HOX)-containing genes during embryogenesis. As we previously demonstrated a functional link between overexpression of HOXB7 and melanoma progression.. we investigated the lack of PLZF as the possible cause of HOXB7 constitutive activation in these neoplastic cells. Accordingly, we found PLZF expression in melanocytes, but not in melanoma cells, a pattern inversely related to that of HOXB7. PLZF retroviral gene transduction was then performed in a panel of melanoma cell lines, and tumorigenicity was compared with that of empty vector-transduced control cell lines. Evaluation of in vitro migration, invasion and adhesion indicated that PLZF gene transduction induced a less malignant phenotype, as confirmed through in vitro studies performed in athymic nude mice. This reduced tumorigenicity was not coupled with HOXB7 repression. In order to find more about the molecular targets of PLZF, the gene expression profiles of PLZF- and empty vector-transduced A375 melanoma cells were analysed by Atlas Cancer macro-array. Among several genes modulated by PLZF enforced expression, of particular interest were integrin alphavbeta3, osteonectin/SPARC and matrix metalloprotease-9 that were downmodulated, and the tyrosinase-related protein-1 that was upregulated in all the analysed samples. This profile confirms the reduced tumorigenic phenotype with reversion to a more differentiated, melanocyte like, pattern, thus suggesting a suppressor role for PLZF in solid tumors. Moreover, these results indicate that PLZF and HOXB7 are functionally independent and that their coupled deregulation may account for most of the alterations described in melanomas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据