4.7 Article

Randomized multicenter trial of natalizumab in acute MS relapses - Clinical and MRI effects

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 62, 期 11, 页码 2038-2043

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000128136.79044.D6

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Relapses in multiple sclerosis ( MS) can cause significant neurologic disability. Natalizumab (Antegren) is a humanized anti-alpha4-integrin antibody that inhibits the trafficking of leukocytes across endothelium by blocking binding of alpha4beta1-integrin to vascular cell adhesion molecule-1. Objective: To assess the effects of a single dose of IV natalizumab administered soon after the onset of MS relapses. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial, the effects of a single dose of IV natalizumab administered soon after the onset of MS relapses were assessed. MS patients (n = 180) in acute relapse were randomly assigned to receive a single dose of natalizumab 1 or 3 mg/kg or placebo and were followed for 14 weeks. Results: There was no difference in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score change over time between treatment and placebo groups. In all three groups, approximately half of patients showed EDSS improvement after 2 weeks, rising to 67% by 8 weeks. EDSS improved by a mean value of 0.8 point at week 1, 1.2 points at week 4, and 1.6 points at week 8 in the natalizumab group compared with EDSS improvement of 1.0 point at week 1, 1.6 points at week 4, and 1.6 points at week 8 in the placebo group. A significant decrease in Gd-enhancing lesion volume was seen in both active treatment groups at weeks 1 and 3 compared with placebo. Conclusions: A single dose of IV natalizumab did not hasten clinical recovery after relapse, although a significant decrease in Gd-enhancing lesion volume was observed at 1 and 3 weeks after treatment. These MRI findings are consistent with prior studies of natalizumab and support its further investigation as an agent for the treatment of MS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据