4.7 Article

The production of HI in photodissociation regions and a comparison with CO (1-0) emission

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 608, 期 1, 页码 314-322

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/381488

关键词

atomic processes; galaxies : ISM; ISM : atoms; ISM : clouds; ISM : molecules; line : formation; molecular processes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The gas at the surfaces of molecular clouds in galaxies is heated and dissociated by photons from young stars both near and far. H I resulting from the dissociation of molecular hydrogen H-2 emits hyperfine line emission at 21 cm, and warmed CO emits dipole rotational lines such as the 2.6 mm line of CO (1-0). We use previously developed models for photodissociation regions (PDRs) to compute the intensities of these H I and CO (1-0) lines as a function of the total volume density n in the cloud and the far-ultraviolet (FUV) flux G(0) incident on it and present the results in units familiar to observers. The intensities of these two lines behave differently with changing physical conditions in the PDR, and taken together, the two lines can provide a ground-based radio astronomy diagnostic for determining n and G0 separately in distant molecular clouds. This diagnostic is particularly useful in the range G(0) less than or similar to100, 10 cm(-3) less than or similar to n less than or similar to 10(5) cm(-3), which applies to a large fraction of the volume of the interstellar medium in galaxies. If the molecular cloud is located near discrete sources of far-UV (FUV) emission, the PDR-generated H I and CO (1-0) emission on the cloud surface can be more easily identified, appearing as layered blankets'' or blisters'' on the side of the cloud nearest the FUV source. As an illustration, we consider the Galactic object G216-2.5, i.e., Maddalena's Cloud,'' which has been previously identified as a large PDR in the Galaxy. We determine that this cloud has n approximate to 200 cm(-3) and G(0) approximate to 0.8, consistent with other data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据