4.6 Article

Natural history of hepatitis B e antigen to antibody seroconversion in patients with normal serum aminotransferase levels

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 116, 期 12, 页码 829-834

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.12.040

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Natural history studies of hepatitis B virus infection have shown relapse of hepatitis in 5% to 15% of patients and progression to cirrhosis in 2% to 6% annually. Follow-up of patients beginning at the early phase of infection might provide data with less referral bias than in previous studies. METHODS: Test of liver biochemistry, assessment of virological markers, and ultrasound examinations were performed at regular intervals during the course of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) to antibody (anti-HBe) seroconversion in 240 HBeAg carriers with normal alanine aminotransferase levels at baseline. Factors predictive of cirrhosis were identified by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: We enrolled 130 men and 110 women. The mean (+/- SD) age at entry was 27.6 +/- 6.2 years. During the HBeAg-positive phase, 29% of patients had alanine aminotransferase levels greater than or equal to200 U/L, 3% had bilirubin levels greater than or equal to2.0 mg/dL, and 5% had two or more episodes of alanine aminotransferase levels greater than or equal to200 U/L. The mean age at anti-HBe seroconversion was 31.3 +/- 7.0 years, with remission of hepatitis in all patients. However, hepatitis recurred in 36 patients (15%), with an annual rate of 2.2%. Thirteen patients (5%) progressed to cirrhosis. The annual incidence of cirrhosis was 0.5%, and the cumulative probability of cirrhosis after 17 years was 12.6%. Age at anti-HBe seroconversion and relapse of hepatitis were independent risk factors for cirrhosis. CONCLUSION: The clinical severity of chronic hepatitis B was milder in this cohort than in previous studies. Delayed HBeAg seroconversion and relapse of hepatitis were associated with increased risk of cirrhosis. (C) 2004 by Excerpta Medica Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据