4.8 Article

Identification of genetic variants in base excision repair pathway and their associations with risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 64, 期 12, 页码 4378-4384

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0372

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The etiology of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has been shown to be associated with genetic and certain environmental factors that produce DNA damage. Base excision repair (BER) genes are responsible for repair of DNA damage caused by reactive oxygen species and other electrophiles and therefore are good candidate susceptibility genes for ESCC. We first screened eight BER genes for new and potential functional polymorphisms by resequencing 27 DNA samples. We then identified and genotyped for important tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a case-control study of 419 patients with newly diagnosed esophageal cancer and 480 healthy controls by frequency matching on age and sex. The association between genotypes and ESCC risk was estimated by unconditional multivariate logistic regression analysis, and stepwise regression procedure was used for constructing the final logistic regression model. We identified 129 SNPs in the eight BER genes, including 18 SNPs that cause amino acid changes. In the final model, 4 SNPs, including 2 in the coding regions (ADPRT Val762Ala and MBD4 Glu346Lys) and others in noncoding regions (LIG3 A3704G and XRCC1 T-77C), remained as significant predictors for the risk of ESCC. The adjusted odd ratios were 1.25 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.53] for the ADPRT 762Ala allele, 1.25 (95% Cl 1.02-1.53) for the MBD4 346 Lys allele, 0.78 (95% Cl 0.63-0.97) for the LIG3 3704G allele, and 1.38 (95% Cl 1.01-1.89) for the XRCC1-77C allele. In addition, we observed a significant gene-gene interaction between XRCC1 Gln399Arg and ADPRT Val762Ala. The results suggest that the polymorphisms in five BER genes may be associated with the susceptibility to ESCC in a Chinese population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据