4.7 Article

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem-cell support compared with standard-dose chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with 10 or more positive lymph nodes:: First results of a randomized trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 22, 期 12, 页码 2273-2283

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.07.026

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Investigation of high-dose chemotherapy (HD-CT) followed by autologous hematopoietic stem-cell support compared with standard-dose chemotherapy (SD-CT) as adjuvant treatment in patients with primary breast cancer and 10 or more positive axillary lymph nodes. Patients and Methods Between November 1993 and September 2000, 307 patients were randomized to receive (following four cycles of epirubicin go mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2), intravenously every 21 days) either HD-CT of cyclophosphamide 1,500 mg/m(2), thiotepa 150 mg/m(2), and mitoxantrone 10 mg/m(2), intravenously for 4 consecutive days followed by stem-cell support; or SD-CT in three cycles of cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2), methotrexate 40 mg/m(2), and fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1 and 8, every 28 days. The primary end point was event-free survival. Results After a median follow-up of 3.8 years, 144 events with respect to event-free survival have been observed (HD-CT: 63 events; SD-CT: 81 events). The first event of failure (HD-CT v SD-CT) was an isolated locoregional recurrence (nine v 11), a distant failure (52 v 68), and death without recurrence (two v two). The estimated relative risk of HD-CT versus SD-CT was 0.75 (95% Cl, 0.54 to 1.06; P =.095). Overall survival showed no difference HD-CT: 40 deaths; SD-CT: 49 deaths). Conclusion There was a trend in favor of HD-CT with respect to event-free survival, but without statistical significance. Further follow-up and a meta-analysis of all randomized studies will reveal the effect of HD-CT as compared with SD-CT as adjuvant treatment in high-risk primary breast cancer. (C) 2004 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据