4.7 Article

Synthesis, structure-activity relationships, and drug resistance of β-D-3′-fluoro-2′,3′-unsaturated nucleosides as anti-HIV agents

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 47, 期 13, 页码 3399-3408

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jm040027j

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI 25899, AI 32351] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our recent studies demonstrated that D- and L-2'-fluoro-2',3'-unsaturated nucleosides (D- and L-2'-F-d4Ns) display moderate to potent antiviral activities against HIV-1 and HBV. As an extension of these findings, beta-D-3'-fluoro-2',3'-unsaturated nucleosides were synthesized as potential antiviral agents. The key intermediate (2S)-5-(1,3-dioxolan)-1-benzoyloxy-3,3-difluoropentan-2-ol 6 was prepared from 2,3-O-isopropylidene-D-glyceraldehyde 1, which was converted to 5-O-benzoxy-D-2-deoxy-3,3-difluoropentofuranosyl acetate 7 by the ring-closure reaction under acidic conditions. The acetate 7 was condensed with silylated purine and pyrimidine bases, which produced the alpha and beta isomers. The 3',3'-difluoro nucleosides were then treated with t-BuOK to give the desired X-fluoro-unsaturated nucleosides. We studied the structure-activity relationships of D-3'-fluoro-2',3'-unsaturated nucleosides against HIV-1 in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, from which we found that the cytosine derivative 26 was the most potent among the synthesized compounds. To understand the mode of action and drug resistance profile, with particular regard to the role of fluorine, we performed the molecular modeling studies of the cytidine analogue D-3'F-d4C and found a good correlation between calculated relative binding energies and activity/resistance data. Our model also shows interactions of the X-fluorine and the 2',3' double bond, which can be correlated to the observed biological data. Differences between fluorine substitution at the 3' and 2' positions may account for the higher cross-resistance with lamivudine observed in the 2'-fluorinated series.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据