4.6 Article

Heme distortion modulated by ligand-protein interactions in inducible nitric-oxide synthase

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 279, 期 25, 页码 26489-26499

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M400968200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA53914] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL65465] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM07288, GM08572, GM51491, GM54806] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The catalytic center of nitric-oxide synthase ( NOS) consists of a thiolate-coordinated heme macrocycle, a tetrahydrobiopterin (H4B) cofactor, and an L-arginine (L-Arg)/N-hydroxyarginine substrate binding site. To determine how the interplay between the cofactor, the substrates, and the protein matrix housing the heme regulates the enzymatic activity of NOS, the CO-, NO-, and CN--bound adducts of the oxygenase domain of the inducible isoform of NOS (iNOS(oxy)) were examined with resonance Raman spectroscopy. The Raman data of the CO- bound ferrous protein demonstrated that the presence of L-Arg causes the Fe-C-O moiety to adopt a bent structure because of an H-bonding interaction whereas H4B binding exerts no effect. Similar behavior was found in the CN--bound ferric protein and in the nitric oxide (NO)-bound ferrous protein. In contrast, in the NO- bound ferric complexes, the addition of L-Arg alone does not affect the structural properties of the Fe-N-O moiety, but H4B binding forces it to adopt a bent structure, which is further enhanced by the subsequent addition of L-Arg. The differential interactions between the various heme ligands and the protein matrix in response to L-Arg and/or H4B binding is coupled to heme distortions, as reflected by the development of a variety of out-of-plane heme modes in the low frequency Raman spectra. The extent and symmetry of heme deformation modulated by ligand, substrate, and cofactor binding may provide important control over the catalytic and autoinhibitory properties of the enzyme.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据