4.5 Article

Quantum stereodynamics of the F+H2→HF+H reaction by the stereodirected S-matrix approach

期刊

CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 301, 期 2-3, 页码 251-259

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2004.02.002

关键词

stereodynamics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reaction stereodynamics can be studied in quantum mechanics using alternative representations of the S matrix. In this paper we employ the equations for the orthogonal transformations (expressed in terms of Wigner 3j symbols) that convert the S matrix from the body fixed (\jOmega>) representation into the stereodirected one (\vOmega>). This representation is characterized by the introduction of the steric quantum number v, which in the vector model of quantum mechanics is put into correspondence with given precession cones of attack of the incoming atom on the diatomic molecule for the reactants' channels, and of cones of escape for the departing atom away from the diatomic molecule for the products' channels. The angles of aperture of such cones are determined from the uncertainty principle. As the v quantum number increases (semiclassical limit), the grid of discrete values of the precession cones more finely scans the angle between the Jacobi vectors. Using a time-independent hyperspherical coordinate method we have generated the full S matrix including all open reactive and inelastic channels for two potential energy surfaces corresponding to the F + H-2 --> HF + H reaction and they have been used to calculate, via \jOmega> --> \vOmega> matrix transformations, the attack and exit cumulative reaction probabilities. During the calculations, we have distinguished between ortho-H-2 and para-H-2. Clear stereodynamical effects have being identified, in particular, regarding the reaction entrance channel, that F-atom attacks are preferred at the transition state (bent) geometry, while for the exit channel the H-atom departs in a collinear geometry by the H-end side of HF. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据