4.6 Article

Elucidating the role of conserved glutamates in H+-pyrophosphatase of Rhodospirillum rubrum

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 279, 期 26, 页码 26811-26816

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M404154200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

H+-pyrophosphatase (H+-PPase) catalyzes pyrophosphate-driven proton transport against the electrochemical potential gradient in various biological membranes. All 50 of the known H+-PPase amino acid sequences contain four invariant glutamate residues. In this study, we use site-directed mutagenesis in conjunction with functional studies to determine the roles of the glutamate residues Glu(197), Glu(202), Glu(550), and Glu(649) in the H+-PPase of Rhodospirillum rubrum (R-PPase). All residues were replaced with Asp and Ala. The resulting eight variant R-PPases were expressed in Escherichia coli and isolated as inner membrane vesicles. All substitutions, except E202A, generated enzymes capable of PPi hydrolysis and PPi-energized proton translocation, indicating that the negative charge of Glu(202) is essential for R-PPase function. The hydrolytic activities of all other PPase variants were impaired at low Mg2+ concentrations but were only slightly affected at high Mg2+ concentrations, signifying that catalysis proceeds through a three-metal pathway in contrast to wild-type R-PPase, which employs both two- and three-metal pathways. Substitution of Glu(197), Glu(202), and Glu(649) resulted in decreased binding affinity for the substrate analogues aminomethylenediphosphonate and methylenediphosphonate, indicating that these residues are involved in substrate binding as ligands for bridging metal ions. Following the substitutions of Glu(550) and Glu(649), R-PPase was more susceptible to inactivation by the sulfhydryl reagent mersalyl, highlighting a role of these residues in maintaining enzyme tertiary structure. None of the substitutions affected the coupling of PPi hydrolysis to proton transport.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据