4.7 Article

Soil erosion after Eucalyptus globulus clearcutting:: differences between logging slash disposal treatments

期刊

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
卷 195, 期 1-2, 页码 85-95

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.02.052

关键词

E. globulus; harvesting; clearcutting; logging slash disposal; soil erosion; burning

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of different logging slash disposal techniques on soil erosion for 3 years after harvesting was evaluated in a clear-felled Eucalyptus globulus Labill. stand on a representative coastal site in Galicia (NW Spain). The treatments compared were: slash scattering; slash scattering + fertilization; windrowing; scattering + burning (broadcast burning) and windrowing + strip burning (windrow burning). Accumulated soil losses were relatively small and particularly in slash scattering treatments. Both burning treatments resulted in significantly higher losses (between 7 and 110 times) than the other disposal methods. Broadcast burning generated less erosion than windrow burning in the first year after treatment but not in the second. The severe burning conditions in windrow burns reduced drastically the protective soil organic layer. Slash scattered (alone or combined with fertilization) on the ground was the most efficient treatment and gave negligible soil losses. Cover by slash or litter and duff significantly controlled soil losses. In burn treatments, remaining slash and litter + duff reduced soil losses. The duration of soil heating significantly affected the remaining soil organic cover on burned soils and this, in turn, was significantly influenced by surface soil moisture content immediately before burning. Soil moisture content just before burns was the key to constrain soil losses after slash burning. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据