4.6 Article

Insights into adenoviral vector production kinetics in acoustic filter-based perf usion cultures

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
卷 86, 期 7, 页码 765-774

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.20074

关键词

adenovirus production; perfusion culture; acoustic; separator; HEK-293 cells; on-line monitoring; respiration; biovolume; fluorescence detection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One of the major limitations in the production of adenoviral vectors is the reduction in cell-specific productivity observed for increasing cell density at infection in batch cultures. This observation strongly suggests some nutrient depletion and/or metabolite inhibition in the media. These limitations have been partially overcome through other feeding strategies, such as fed-batch and sequential batch operations. To improve these results, we evaluated perfusion as a strategy to increase the volumetric productivity of HEK-293 cell cultures, by allowing productive infection at higher cell densities. An acoustic cell separator was employed in consideration of the increased shear sensitivity of the cells during the infection phase. The effects of perfusion rate and cell density at infection on the production of a recombinant adenovirus expressing the GFP were investigated. The perfusion mode allowed successful infection at cell densities in the range of 2.4 - 3 x 10(6) cell/ mL, while maintaining a similar cell specific productivity (17,900 +/- 2400 VP/cell) to that of a batch infected at a low cell density (5 x 10(5) cell/mL). The highest virus concentrations (4.1 +/- 0.6 x 10(10) VP/mL) were attained for a feed rate of 2 vol/d and constituted a fivefold increase compare to a batch with medium replacement. Rapid assessment of the infection status was achieved through the use of online monitoring of respiration, fluorescence, and biovolume. Analysis of the kinetics of nutrient consumption and metabolite production revealed that a reduction in specific productivity is correlated with reduced metabolic activity. (C) 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据