4.8 Article

Removal of carbon and nutrients from domestic wastewater using a low investment, integrated treatment concept

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 38, 期 13, 页码 3031-3042

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.04.040

关键词

domestic wastewater; anaerobic treatment; CEPT pretreatment; zeolite; UASB; LIST

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An integrated chemical-physical-biological treatment concept for the low-cost treatment of domestic wastewater is proposed. Domestic wastewater was subjected to a chemically enhanced primary treatment (CEPT), followed by treatment in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. In addition, a regenerable zeolite was used to remove NH4+, either after CEPT pretreatment or after biological treatment in the UASB reactor. The CEPT pretreatment consisted of the addition of a coagulant (FeCl3) and an anionic organic flocculant and removed on average 73% of the total chemical oxygen demand (CODt), 85% of the total suspended solids, and 80% PO43- present in the wastewater. The UASB system, which consequently received a low CODt input of approximately 140mg/L, was operated using a volumetric loading rate of 0.4 g COD1/L. d (hydraulic retention time [HRT] = 10h) and 0.7 g CODt/L. d (HRT= 5 h). For these conditions, the system removed about 55% of the CODt in its influent, thus producing an effluent with a low CODt of approximately 50mg/L. The zeolite, when applied in batch mode before the UASB reactor, removed approximately 45% of the NH4+, whereas its application as a post-treatment cartridge resulted in almost 100% NH4+ removal. The simple design and relatively low operating costs, due to low costs of added chemicals and low energy input (estimated at E 0.07-0.1 per m(3) wastewater treated), combined with excellent treatment performance, means that this system can be used as a novel domestic wastewater treatment system for developing countries. Therefore, the system is called a Low Investment Sewage Treatment (LIST) system. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据