4.5 Article

Ventilatory, cerebrovascular, and cardiovascular interactions in acute hypoxia: regulation by carbon dioxide

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 97, 期 1, 页码 149-159

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01385.2003

关键词

cerebral blood flow; ventilation; hypercapnia; isocapnia; poikilocapnia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the effect of high, normal, and uncontrolled end-tidal PCO2 (PETCO2) on the ventilatory, peak cerebral blood flow velocity ((V) over bar (p)), and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) responses to acute hypoxia. Nine healthy subjects undertook, in random order, three hypoxic protocols (end-tidal PO2 was held at eight steps between 300 and 45 Torr) in conditions of hypercapnia, isocapnia, or poikilocapnia (PETCO2 +7.5 Torr, +1.0 Torr, or uncontrolled, respectively). Transcranial Doppler ultrasound was used to measure (V) over bar (p) in the middle cerebral artery. The slopes of the linear regressions of ventilation, (V) over bar (p), and MAP with arterial 02 saturation were significantly greater in hypercapnia than in both isocapnia and poikilocapnia (P < 0.05). Strong, significant correlations were observed between ventilation, (V) over bar (p), and MAP with each PETCO2 condition. These data suggest that 1) a high acute hypoxic ventilatory response (AHVR) decreases the acute hypoxic cerebral blood flow responses during poikilocapnia hypoxia, due to hypocapnic-induced cerebral vasoconstriction, and 2) in hypercapnic hypoxia, a high AHVR is associated with a high acute hypoxic cerebral blood flow response, demonstrating a linkage of individual sensitivities of ventilation and cerebral blood flow to the interaction Of PETCO2 and hypoxia. In summary, the between-individual-variability in AHVR is shown to be firmly linked to the variability in (V) over bar (p) and MAP responses to hypoxia. Individuals with a high AHVR are found also to have high (V) over bar (p) and MAP responses to hypoxia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据