4.5 Article

Critical in vivo roles for classical estrogen receptors in rapid estrogen actions on intracellular signaling in mouse brain

期刊

ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 145, 期 7, 页码 3055-3061

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/en.2003-1676

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Estrogen exerts classical genomic as well as rapid nongenomic actions on neurons. The mechanisms involved in rapid estrogen signaling are poorly defined, and the roles of the classical estrogen receptors (ERs alpha and beta) are unclear. We examined here the in vivo role of classical ERs in rapid estrogen actions by evaluating the estrogen-induced effects on two major signaling pathways within the brains of alphaER-, betaER-, and double alphabetaER-knockout (ERKO) ovariectomized female mice. Estrogen significantly (P < 0.05) increased the numbers of phospho-cAMP response element binding protein (phospho-CREB)-immunoreactive cells in specific brain regions of wild-type mice in a time-dependent manner beginning within 15 min. In brain areas that express predominantly ER beta, this response was absent in beta ERKO mice, whereas brain regions that express mostly ER alpha displayed no change in alpha ERKO mice. the medial preoptic nucleus (MPN), an area that expresses both ERs, the estrogen-induced phosphorylation of CREB was normal in both alpha ERKO and beta ERKO mice. However, estrogen had no effect on CREB phosphorylation in the MPN, or any other brain region, in double alpha beta ERKO animals. Estrogen was also found to increase MAPK phosphorylation levels in a rapid (<15 min) manner within the MPN. In contrast to CREB signaling, this effect was lost in either alphaERKO or betaERKO mice. These data show that ERalpha and ERbeta play region- and pathway-specific roles in rapid estrogen actions throughout the brain. They further indicate an indispensable role for classical ERs in rapid estrogen actions in vivo and highlight the importance of ERs in coordinating both classical and rapid actions of estrogen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据