4.5 Article

Helicobacter pylori impairs iron absorption in infected individuals

期刊

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
卷 36, 期 7, 页码 455-460

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2004.02.008

关键词

absorption test; anaemia; duodenitis; gastritis; gender; Helicobacter pylori; iron

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Infection with Helicobacter pylori is recognised as a major risk factor for chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer. The association between H. pylori infection and iron deficiency anaemia has been established. Multiple mechanisms have been advocated to explain the relationship between H. pylori and iron status and their association might reduce iron deposit. Aim. Aim of this study was to investigate whether H. pylori infection affects iron absorption. Methods. The study was designed on a prospective basis. Fifty-five subjects underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and biopsy to investigate the presence of H. pylori and, when this was positive, also search of serum anti-CagA was performed. Tests included an oral iron absorption test with the administration of 1 mg/kg of Fe(2+). Iron levels were measured before and 2 h after iron administration (delta iron). H. pylori-positive subjects were administered antibiotic therapy for 1 week and, 2 months later, the oral iron absorption test was repeated and urea-breath test was first performed. Results. H. pylori-positive subjects had lower serum level of ferritin and lower delta iron compared to H. pylori-negative subjects. That difference is significant in anaemic women and is independent of the presence of serum anti-Ca-A antibodies. After H. pylori eradication iron absorption test was similar to those of non-infected subjects. Conclusion. H. pylori infection impairs iron uptake. That mechanism, together with others, may contribute to the depletion of iron in infected patients. (C) 2004 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据