4.6 Article

Light dependence of [3H]leucine incorporation in the oligotrophic North Pacific ocean

期刊

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 70, 期 7, 页码 4079-4087

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.7.4079-4087.2004

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of irradiance on bacterial incorporation of [H-3] leucine was evaluated at Station ALOHA in the oligotrophic North Pacific subtropical gyre. Six experiments were conducted on three cruises to Station ALOHA to examine how [H-3]leucine incorporation varied as a function of irradiance. Two experiments were also conducted to assess the photoautotrophic response to irradiance (based on photosynthetic uptake of [C-14] bicarbonate) in both the upper and lower photic zones. Rates of [H-3]leucine incorporation responded to irradiance in a photosynthesis-like manner, increasing sharply at low light and then saturating and sometimes declining with increasing light intensity. The influence of irradiance on bacterial growth was evaluated in both the well-lit (5 to 25 m) and dimly lit regions of the upper ocean (75 to 100 m) to determine whether the bacterial response to irradiance differed along the depth-dependent light gradient of the photic zone. [H-3] leucine incorporation rates were analyzed with a photosynthesis-irradiance model for a quantitative description of the relationships between [H-3] leucine incorporation and irradiance. Maximum rates of [H-3] leucine incorporation in the upper photic zone increased 48 to 92% relative to those of dark-incubated samples, with [H-3]leucine incorporation saturating at light intensities between 58 and 363 mumol of quanta m(-2) s(-1). Rates of [H-3]Ieucine incorporation in the deep photic zone were photostimulated 53 to 114% and were susceptible to photoinhibition, with rates declining at light intensities of >100 mumol of quanta m(-2) s(-1). The results of these experiments revealed that sunlight directly influences bacterial growth in this open-ocean ecosystem.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据