4.7 Article

Chemical abundances in QSO host galaxies and environments from narrow absorption line systems

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07840.x

关键词

galaxies : abundances; galaxies : active; galaxies : elliptical and lenticular, cD; galaxies : evolution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We determined C, N and alpha-element relative abundances in the gas surrounding six quasi-stellar objects (QSOs) at an average redshift of [z] similar or equal to 2.4, by studying six narrow associated absorption systems in Ultraviolet Visual Echelle Spectrograph (UVES) high-resolution spectra. We found five systems with a metallicity (measured by C/H) consistent or above the solar value. The ionization structure observed in the associated systems is clearly different from that of the intervening ones, indicating that the associated systems are influenced by the strong UV flux from the QSO. There is a possible correlation (anticorrelation) between [N/C] ([Si/C]) and [C/H] of the studied associated systems, and [N/C] greater than or equal to 0 when [C/H] greater than or equal to 0. We have compared these observational results with the predictions of a model simulating the joint evolution of QSOs and their spheroidal hosts. The agreement turns out to be very good; in particular, the case envisaging massive haloes and high star formation rates recovers both the correlation between [N/C] and [C/H] and the anticorrelation for [Si/C] versus [C/H]. Narrow associated absorption systems prove to be powerful tracers of the chemical abundances in gas belonging to high-redshift spheroidal galaxies. The outflow of this same gas, triggered by the QSO feedback, is probably going to contribute to the early enrichment of the surrounding intergalactic medium. A larger sample, possibly increasing the number of ionization stages, chemical elements and the redshift range, would allow us to put firm constraints on detailed chemical evolution models of galaxies at high redshifts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据