4.7 Article

Effect of vacancy on adsorption/dissociation and diffusion of H2S on Fe(100) surfaces: A density functional theory study

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 465, 期 -, 页码 833-845

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.09.220

关键词

Density functional theory (DFT) calculations; Fe(100); Vacancy defects; Dissociation energy barrier; Diffusion path

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51671215, 51805292, 21503273]
  2. National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents [BX201700132]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vacancy defects on an iron surface have a great influence on the occurrence of hydrogen embrittlement. The adsorption/dissociation mechanism of H2S and the diffusion behavior of H atoms were calculated by first-principles spin-polarization density functional theory (DFT) on defect-free and vacancy-defective Fe(100) surfaces. The results show that the maximum dissociation energy barriers of H2S on the Fe(100) surface of defect-free and first-layer vacancy-defective Fe are 0.35 and 0.17 eV, respectively, indicating that the reactivity of the vacancy-defective Fe(100) surface is moderately increased. The existence of vacancy defects changes the preferential H atom diffusion entrance to the subsurface and shortens the diffusion path. For H diffusion in bulk Fe(100), it is found that H atoms diffuse via a tortuous path from one tetrahedral-site to a neighboring tetrahedral-site rather than diffusing through a linear trajectory. Moreover, the previously suggested path via the octahedral site is excluded due to its higher barrier and the rank of the saddle point. Diffusion barriers computed for H atom penetration from the surface into the inner-layers are approximately 0.54 eV (except for second-layer vacancy defects), which are all greater than the activation energy for dissociation of H2S on the Fe(100) surfaces. This suggests that H diffusion is more probable than H2S dissociation as the rate-limiting step for hydrogen permeation into the bulk Fe(100).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据