4.7 Article

A novel natural SERS system for crystal violet detection based on graphene oxide wrapped Ag micro-islands substrate fabricated from Lotus leaf as a template

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 459, 期 -, 页码 802-811

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.065

关键词

SEAS; Lotus leaf; Graphene oxide; Ag; Stability

资金

  1. Youth Fund Project of University Science and Technology Plan of Hebei Provincial Department of Education [QN2015004]
  2. Doctoral Fund of Yanshan University [B924]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21676015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A stable biomimetic surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) system was fabricated by covering graphene oxide (GO) on the Ag micro-islands substrate using micro/nanostructured Lotus leaf (L.l.) as a template via the simple magnetron sputtering system and dip-coated method. The Raman signals of crystal violet (CV) on the GO-Ag-L.l.-30 substrate (the sputtering time was 30 min) showed far better SEAS performances than Ag-L.l.-30 hybrids in terms of signal enhancement, sensitivity and stability. The results suggested that the SEAS activity of the bio-inspired GO-Ag-L.l.-30 substrate using CV as probe molecules showed an enhancement factor (EF) of similar to 1.52 x 10(6). Sensitivity tests indicated that the limit of detection (LOD) for CV was as low as 5 x 10(-10) M, which was two orders of magnitude lower than Ag-L.l.-30 substrate. Time-stability for 30 days was also reported which revealed that the Raman intensity of CV on GO-Ag-L.l.-30 substrate only reduced by 18.2% after aging for 30 days. Moreover, the maximum relative standard deviations (RSD) of Raman intensities was less than 7.09%, demonstrating outstanding reproducibility and uniformity of GO-Ag-L.l.-30 substrate. Therefore, the cost-efficient and high-performance SEAS system shows great application prospects in biochemical sensing and attracts broad attention to many other natural materials which can be prepared as multifarious novel SEAS systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据