4.7 Article

The effects of tungsten and hydrothermal aging in promoting NH3-SCR activity on V2O5/WO3-TiO2 catalysts

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 459, 期 -, 页码 639-646

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.046

关键词

V2O5/WO3-TiO2; Hydrothermal treatment; Polymeric surface VOx; Low valence vanadium; NH3-SCR

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51702215, 51572240, 51677170]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LY16E070004, LY17E020010]
  3. Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province [2016C31012, 2016C33009]
  4. Shaoxing Bureau of Science and Technology [2017B70051]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fresh catalysts of V2O5-TiO2 (VTi) and V2O5/WO3-TiO2 (VWTi) were prepared via an impregnation method. The hydrothermal aged samples were obtained at 750 degrees C for 24 h under airflow with 10 vol% water vapor. Compared to the fresh catalysts, the catalytic performance of the aged catalysts (VTi-A and VWTi-A) has been significantly improved. Particularly, VWTi-A displayed the best activity over a wide temperature range (NOx conversion: > 90% @ 250-550 degrees C). Structural characterizations indicated that the surface area of the aged catalysts was dramatically decreased, and the morphologies of catalysts also changed. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), H-2 temperature-programmed reduction (H-2-TPR), and Raman results demonstrated that hydrothermal aging greatly influenced the migration and agglomeration of vanadium species. As a result, numerous active polymeric VOx species were emerged on the surface of catalysts. More importantly, XPS results revealed that more low valence vanadium species (V4+ and V3+) was produced on the VWTi-A catalysts than that of VTi-A after hydrothermal aging. These low valence vanadium species resulted in considerably higher SCR activity than the high valence vanadium species (V5+). Consequently, both polymeric surface VOx species and low valence vanadium species determined the enhanced low-temperature SCR behavior of the aged catalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据