4.3 Article

Maternal plasma lipid concentrations in early pregnancy and risk of preeclampsia

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
卷 17, 期 7, 页码 574-581

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.03.666

关键词

plasma lipids; obesity; pregnancy; preeclampsia

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [HD/HL 34888, HD/HL 32562] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: We investigated the relationship between early pregnancy plasma lipid concentrations and risk of preeclampsia. Methods: In a prospective cohort study, maternal blood samples were collected at an average of 13 weeks gestation. From the cohort, we selected 57 women who developed preeclampsia and 510 who remained normotensive and served as control subjects. Plasma lipid concentrations were measured enzymatically by standardized assays. Logistic regression procedures were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (0). Results: Women who subsequently developed preeclampsia had 10.4%, 13.6%, and 15.5% higher concentrations of LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL/HDL ratios, respectively, than did control subjects (P < .05). The HDL cholesterol concentrations were 7.0% lower in women with preeclampsia than in control subjects (P < .05). After adjustment, there was a 3.60-fold increase in risk of preeclampsia among women with total cholesterol >205 mg/dL (95% Cl 1.23 to 10.51) and a 4.15-fold increase in the risk of preeclampsia among women with triglyceride levels >133 mg/dL (95% Cl 1.50 to 11.49). A linear increase in preeclampsia risk was observed with increasing tertiles of LDL cholesterol, triglyceride concentrations, and LDL/HDL ratio (all P < .05 for trend). Conclusion: Early pregnancy dyslipidermia is associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia. This association may be significant in understanding the pathologic processes of preeclampsia and may help in developing strategies for prevention or early diagnosis of the disorder. (C) 2004 American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据