4.6 Article

Experimental cerebral hypoperfusion induces white matter injury and microglial activation in the rat brain

期刊

ACTA NEUROPATHOLOGICA
卷 108, 期 1, 页码 57-64

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00401-004-0864-9

关键词

astrocyte; cerebral hypoperfusion; microglia; optic tract; white matter

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Though cerebral white matter injury is a frequently described phenomenon in aging and dementia, the cause of white matter lesions has not been conclusively determined. Since the lesions are often associated with cerebrovascular risk factors, ischemia emerges as a potential condition for the development of white matter injury. In the present study, we induced experimental cerebral hypoperfusion by permanent, bilateral occlusion of the common carotid arteries of rats (n=6). A sham-operated group served as control (n=6). Thirteen weeks after the onset of occlusion, markers for astrocytes, microglia, and myelin were found to be labeled by means of immunocytochemistry in the corpus callosum, the internal capsule, and the optic tract. The ultrastructural integrity and oligodendrocyte density in the optic tract were investigated by electron microscopy. Quantitative analysis revealed that chronic cerebral hypoperfusion caused mild astrogliosis in the corpus callosum and the internal capsule, while astrocytic disintegration in the optic tract increased by 50%. Further, a ten-fold increase in microglial activation and a nearly doubled oligodendrocyte density were measured in the optic tract of the hypoperfused rats as compared with the controls. Finally, vacuolization and irregular myelin sheaths were observed at the ultrastructural level in the optic tract. In summary, the rat optic tract appears to be particularly vulnerable to ischemia, probably because of the rat brain's angioarchitecture. Since the detected glial changes correspond with those reported in vascular and Alzheimer dementia, this model of cerebral hypoperfusion may serve to characterize the causal relationship between ischemia and white matter damage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据