4.6 Article

Vasoactive factors in sickle cell disease: In vitro evidence for endothelin-1-mediated vasoconstriction

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY
卷 76, 期 3, 页码 245-251

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajh.20107

关键词

sickle cell disease; vasoactive factors; endothelin-1; vasoconstriction

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [01 HL 67682 -01A1] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While systemic plasma endothelin-1 (ET-1) levels are increased during acute crisis in sickle cell disease, the relative levels of potent vasoactive factors that contribute to the regulation of vascular function, such as ET-1, NO, and cell-free hemoglobin, during the course of periodic vaso-occlusive episodes remain unclear. Moreover, whether and to what extent sickling-induced release of ET-1 alters vascular tone is not completely understood. To investigate the sequential changes in circulating vasoactive factors, we measured plasma ET-1, NO metabolites (NOx), and cell-free hemoglobin (Hb) before (steady-state), during (crisis), and after a vaso-occlusive (post-crisis) episode. Steady-state ET-1 levels (fmol/mL) increased from 2.3 +/- 0.4 to 11.0 +/- 1.4 and 4.2 +/- 1.0 during crisis and post-crisis periods, respectively. There was no significant difference in plasma NOx levels. Cell-free Hb levels were significantly higher in sickle cell patients in all phases as compared to the control group, and especially during crisis cell-free Hb levels were elevated by 4-fold (209,000 +/- 31,000 vs. 46,000 +/- 5,300 ng/mL in steady-state). Conditioned medium from human pulmonary artery endothelial cells exposed to sickled erythrocytes prepared by deoxygenation induced contraction of aortic rings, and this effect was blocked by an ETA receptor antagonist. These findings indicate that ET-1 is the predominant contractile factor released by cultured endothelial cells upon exposure to deoxygenated sickled SS erythrocytes and ET-1-NO-NO scavenger balance is altered in favor of vasoconstriction during an acute episode in SCD. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据