4.7 Article

Phasing of deglacial warming and laurentide ice sheet meltwater in the Gulf of Mexico

期刊

GEOLOGY
卷 32, 期 7, 页码 597-600

出版社

GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC
DOI: 10.1130/G20604.1

关键词

Gulf of Mexico; Orca Basin; Laurentide ice sheet; deglaciation; meltwater floods; freshwater switching

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Evidence is emerging that the tropical climate system played a major role in global climate change during the last deglaciation. However, existing studies show that deglacial warming was asynchronous across the tropical band, complicating the identification of causal mechanisms. The Orca Basin in the northern Gulf of Mexico is ideally located to record subtropical Atlantic sea-surface temperature (SST) warming in relation to mellwater input from the Laurentide Ice Sheet. Paired delta(18)O and Mg/Ca data on the planktonic foraminifer Globigerinoides ruber from core EN32-PC6 are used to separate deglacial changes in SST and delta(18)O of seawater. SST as calculated from Mg/Ca data increased by >3 degreesC from ca. 17.2 to 15.5 ka in association with Heinrich event I and was not in phase with Greenland air temperature. Subtracting temperature effects from delta(18)O values in G. ruber reveals two excursions representing Laurentide meltwater input to the Gulf of Mexico, one of >1.5parts per thousand from ca. 16.1 to 15.6 ka and a second major spike of >2.5parts per thousand from ca. 15.2 to 13.0 ka that encompassed meltwater pulse 1A and peaked ca. 13.8 ka during the Bolling-Allerod. Conversion to salinity through the use of a Laurentide meltwater end member of -25parts per thousand indicates that near-surface salinity decreased by 2parts per thousand-4parts per thousand during these spikes. These results suggest that Gulf of Mexico SST warming preceded peak Laurentide Ice Sheet decay and the Bolling-Allerod interval by >2 k.y. and that heat was retained in the subtropical Atlantic during Heinrich event 1, consistent with modulation of deglaciall climate by thermohaline circulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据