4.7 Article

Free-energy density functions for nematic elastomers

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICS AND PHYSICS OF SOLIDS
卷 52, 期 7, 页码 1671-1689

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2003.12.005

关键词

nematic elasticity; polymeric material; anisotropic material; finite strain; constitutive behavior

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The recently proposed neo-classical theory for nematic elastomers generalizes standard molecular-statistical Gaussian network theory to allow for anisotropic distributions of polymer chains. The resulting free-energy density models several of the novel properties of nematic elastomers. In particular, it predicts the ability of nematic elastomers to undergo large deformations with exactly zero force and energy cost-so called soft elasticity. Although some nematic elastomers have been shown to undergo deformations with unusually small applied forces, not all do so, and none deform with zero force. Further, as a zero force corresponds to infinitely many possible deformations in the neo-classical theory, this non-uniqueness leads to serious indeterminacies in numerical schemes. Here we suggest that the neo-classical free-energy density is incomplete and propose an alternative derivation that resolves these difficulties. In our approach, we use the molecular-statistical theory to identify appropriate variables. This yields the choice for the microstructural degrees of freedom as well as two independent strain tensors (the overall macroscopic strain plus a relative strain that indicates how the deformation of the elastomeric microstructure deviates from the macroscopic deformation). We then propose expressions for the free-energy density as a function of the three quantities and show how the material parameters can be measured by two simple tests. The neo-classical free-energy density can be viewed as a special case of our expressions in which the free-energy density is independent of the overall macroscopic strain, thus supporting our view that the neo-classical theory is incomplete. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据