4.5 Article

Nitrogen leaching and denitrification in continuous corn as related to residue management and nitrogen fertilization

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 33, 期 -, 页码 S289-S298

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-003-9138-x

关键词

soil organic matter; nitrate leaching; N-15; tracer N uptake; biomass; NCSWAP simulation; denitrification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Maintaining crop production levels with reductions in terrestrial greenhouse gases requires strategic residue and nitrogen (N) fertilizer management. Our objectives were to: (1) quantify the effect of nitrogen N application rate on N losses; (2) examine the role of residue returned on N transformation and losses; and (3) verify the capability of the NCSWAP/NCSOIL model to simulate the dynamics of N and N-15 in the soil-plant system. Data obtained from a long-term continuous corn study on a silt loam soil, with two N levels (20 and 200 kg N/ha), with two types of residue management (residue harvested, -R; and residue returned, +R) was used to calibrate the model. The model accurately predicted N-15 in the plant and soil organic matter (SOM) at the 0- to 15-cm and 15- to 30-cm depths for both fertilizer rates and residue managements. Concentrations of N-15 in the corn and SOM were higher for the 20 than 200 kg N/ha treatments. Greater dilution of the N-15 with nontracer fertilizer added at the higher fertilizer rate was responsible for differences in N-15 concentrations in the plant. The predicted cumulative N loss during a 30-year simulation indicates more nitrate leaching past the 1-m depth for -R than +R treatments, while higher denitrification rates were predicted for the +R than -R. The simulated cumulative effect of residue returned on denitrification over 30 years predicted increased cumulative N losses from 1320 to 1705 kg N/ha and 1333 to 2574 kg N/ha for the low and high N application rates, respectively. Better synchronization of N release from residue and addition of N fertilizer with plant-N uptake would minimize leaching and denitrification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据