4.7 Article

Rock avalanching into a landslide-dammed lake causing multiple dam failure in Las Conchas valley (NW Argentina) - evidence from surface exposure dating and stratigraphic analyses

期刊

LANDSLIDES
卷 1, 期 2, 页码 113-122

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10346-004-0013-5

关键词

Rock avalanche; Landslide dam; Surface exposure dating; Argentine Andes; Landslide generated tsunami wave

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Generally landslide dams which exist for several hundreds to thousands of years are considered as stable. We show with an example from the Argentine Andes that such dams can exist for several thousands of years but still may fail catastrophically. Multiple rock avalanches impounded two lakes with surface areas of similar to 8 km(2) and similar to 600 km(2), respectively, in Las Conchas valley, NW Argentina. Surface exposure dating (SED) by Be-10 of the rock-avalanche deposits or landslide scars indicates that these landslides occurred at 15,300 +/- 2,000 yr and 13,550 +/- 900 yr. The dams were stable during a strong earthquake, as suggested by seismites within related lake sediments and by multiple coeval landslides in this region, which occurred at similar to 7.5 kyr. However, when a further rock-avalanche fell into the lower, smaller lake at 4,800 +/- 500 yr the dam downriver was destroyed, presumably by the resulting tsunami wave. The resulting flood also destroyed an additional rock-fall dam which had formed at similar to 5,630 yr C-14 cal BP 30 km downriver. The new dam formed by the second rock avalanche was eroded prior to 3,630 yr C-14 cal BP. This dam erosion coincides with an important climatic shift towards more humid conditions in the Central Andes. Our results show that instead of direct effects of strong seismicity on landslide dams, (1) landsliding into a landslide-dammed lake, (2) abrupt hydrological changes, and (3) climate change towards conditions related to enhanced run-off are processes which can produce failures of quasi-stable natural dams.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据