4.6 Article

Endometrial cytology and ultrasonography for the detection of subclinical endometritis in postpartum dairy cows

期刊

THERIOGENOLOGY
卷 62, 期 1-2, 页码 9-23

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.03.001

关键词

subclinical endometritis; endometrial cytology; ultrasonography; cows

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objectives of the study were to validate the use of endometrial cytology (EC) and ultrasonography (US) to diagnose subc1inical endometritis in clinically normal postpartum dairy cows, and to measure the impact of subclinical endometritis on reproductive performance. Holstein cows from two dairy farms were examined at Visit 1 (V1) at 20-33 days in milk (DIM), and clinically normal cows (n = 228), based on the absence of abnormal discharge on external inspection and vaginoscopy, were selected. The reproductive tract of selected cows was evaluated by transrectal palpation, US and EC. All cows in the study were re-examined at Visit 2 (V2) at 34-47 DIM (2 weeks after V 1) and were subsequently followed for a minimum of 8 months (until pregnant or culled). Survival analysis was used to derive a case definition of subclinical endometritis, based on factors associated with decreased relative pregnancy rate. Positive EC at V1 ( > 18% polymorphonuclear leukocytes; PMN) or fluid in uterus at V1 (FIU1) were associated with a significant reduction in the relative pregnancy rate and identified cows with subclinical endometritis. Similarly, a positive EC ( > 10% PMN) at V2 or fluid in the uterus at V2(FIU2), identified cows with subclinical endometritis. Cows with subclinical endometritis at V1 and at V2 had a relative pregnancy rate of 41 and 51% (hazard ratio for pregnancy of 0.59 and 0.49), respectively, compared to cows without subclinical endometritis. Given EC or US findings, no diagnostic criteria based on transrectal palpation of the uterus had predictive value for risk of pregnancy. In conclusion, subclinical endometritis, diagnosed by EC or US, was associated with reduced relative pregnancy rate. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据