4.7 Article

Hydraulic architecture of plants of Helianthus annuus L. cv. Margot:: evidence for plant segmentation in herbs

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 55, 期 402, 页码 1549-1556

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erh169

关键词

apical dominance; Helianthus annuus L.; hydraulic architecture; leaf hydraulics; senescence; sunflower

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hydraulic architecture of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L. cv. Margot) was studied in terms of the partitioning of the hydraulic conductance (K-leaf) of leaves inserted at progressively more apical nodes both in growing plants (GP) and in plants at full anthesis (mature plants, MP). Leaf conductance to water vapour (g(L)), leaf water potential (Psi(L)), leaf water potential at zero turgor (Psi(tlp)), and leaf osmotic potential at full turgor (pi(0)) were also measured. Sunflower plants showed g(L) and K-leaf values significantly increasing in the acropetal direction, while Psi(L) of basal leaves was significantly more negative than that of distal leaves; Psi(tlp) markedly decreased in the acropetal direction in MP so that leaves of MP retained increasingly more turgor the more apical they were. This hydraulic pattern, already present in very young plants (GP), strongly favours apical leaves. These data suggest that the progressive leaf dieback starting from the stem base, as observed when the inflorescence of sunflower reached maturity, might be due to time-dependent loss of hydraulic conductance. In fact, K-leaf loss was correlated with Psi(L) drop and stomatal closure. Leaf dehydration was aggravated by solute exportation from the basal towards the apical leaves, as revealed by the acropetal decrease of pi(0). K-leaf was shown to be linearly and positively related to the prevailing ambient irradiance during plant growth, thus suggesting that leaf hydraulics is very sensitive to environmental conditions. It was concluded that the pronounced apical dominance of some sunflower cultivars is determined, among other factors, by plant hydraulic architecture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据