4.3 Article

Methodology for hyperspectral band selection

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC PHOTOGRAMMETRY
DOI: 10.14358/PERS.70.7.793

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While hyperspectral data are very rich in information, processing the hyperspectral data poses several challenges regarding computational requirements, information redundancy removal.. relevant information identification, and modeling accuracy. In this paper we present a new methodology for combining unsupervised and supervised methods under classification accuracy and computational requirement constraints that is designed to perform hyperspectral band (wavelength ronge) selection and statistical modeling method selection. The band and method selections are utilized for prediction of continuous ground variables using airborne hyperspectral measurements. The novelty of the proposed work is in combining strengths of unsupervised and supervised band selection methods to build a computationally efficient and accurate band selection system. The unsupervised methods are used to rank hyperspectral bonds while the accuracy of the predictions of supervised methods are used to score those rankings. We conducted experiments with seven unsupervised and three supervised methods. The list of unsupervised methods includes information entropy, first and second spectral derivative, spatial contrast, spectral ratio, correlation, and principal component analysis ranking combined with regression, regression tree, and instance-based supervised methods. These methods were applied to a data set that relates around measurements of soil electrical conductivity with airborne hyperspectral image values. The outcomes of our analysis led to a conclusion that the optimum number of bonds in this domain is the top four to eight bonds obtained by the entropy unsupervised method followed by the regression tree supervised method evaluation. Although the proposed bond selection approach is demonstrated with a data set from the precision agriculture domain, it applies in other hyperspectral application domains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据