4.5 Article

Histone H2A phosphorylation controls Crb2 recruitment at DNA breaks, maintains checkpoint arrest, and influences DNA repair in fission yeast

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
卷 24, 期 14, 页码 6215-6230

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.24.14.6215-6230.2004

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA77325, R01 CA077325] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM059447, GM59447] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mammalian ATR and ATM checkpoint kinases modulate chromatin structures near DNA breaks by phosphorylating a serine residue in the carboxy-terminal tail SQE motif of histone H2AX. Histone H2A is similarly regulated in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The phosphorylated forms of H2AX and H2A, known as gamma-H2AX and gamma-H2A, are thought to be important for DNA repair, although their evolutionarily conserved roles are unknown. Here, we investigate gamma-H2A in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. We show that formation of gamma-H2A redundantly requires the ATR/ATM-related kinases Rad3 and Tell. Mutation of the SQE motif to AQE (H2A-AQE) in the two histone H2A genes caused sensitivity to a wide range of genotoxic agents, increased spontaneous DNA damage, and impaired checkpoint maintenance. The H2A-AQE mutations displayed a striking synergistic interaction with rad22Delta (Rad52 homolog) in ionizing radiation (111) survival. These phenotypes correlated with defective phosphorylation of the checkpoint proteins Crb2 and Chk1 and a failure to recruit large amounts of Crb2 to damaged DNA. Surprisingly, the H2A-AQE mutations substantially suppressed the IR hypersensitivity of crb2Delta cells by a mechanism that required the RecQ-like DNA helicase Rqh1. We propose that gamma-H2A modulates checkpoint and DNA repair through large-scale recruitment of Crb2 to damaged DNA. This function correlates with evidence that gamma-H2AX regulates recruitment of several BRCA1 carboxyl terminus domain-containing proteins (NBS1, 53BP1, MDC1/NFBD1, and BRCA1) in mammals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据