4.7 Article

Physical activation of diatomite-templated carbons and its effect on the adsorption of methylene blue (MB)

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 282, 期 -, 页码 838-843

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.06.067

关键词

Diatomite-templated carbon; Physical activation methods; CO2 activation; H2O activation; Porosity enhancement; Methylene blue adsorption

资金

  1. National Natural Scientific Foundation of China [41202024, 40872042]
  2. National Key Technology Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2013BAC01B02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One- and two-step physical activation methods, using CO2 and H2O as activation agents, were performed to enhance the porosity of diatomite-templated carbons. The morphology, pore parameters, and adsorption capacity of diatomite-templated carbons before and after activation were investigated to evaluate the effects of activation. The results showed deconstruction of the macroporous structure occurred after one-step activation, while two-step activation retained the unique tubular and pillared macroporous structure of diatomite-templated carbon, indicating a highly promising activation method. The newappearing pores after two-step activation were mainly micropores, which formed on the walls of carbon tubes and pillars. Pore parameters, such as the specific surface area and pore volume, as well as the micropore volume, showed a great increase after two-step activation and were 2-3 times larger than those of the original carbon. CO2 was more effective in enhancing the porosity than H2O during two-step activation, and the obtained carbon products had a higher specific surface area and pore volume. Moreover, the carbon products after two-step activation possessed a larger adsorption capacity of methylene blue than the original carbon; the maximum Langmuir adsorption capacity of MB on the CO2-activated carbon was 505.1 mg/g. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据