4.7 Article

Nitrogen doped TiO2 nanotube arrays with high photoelectrochemical activity for photocatalytic applications

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 280, 期 -, 页码 523-529

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.05.021

关键词

Anodization; Nitrogen doped TiO2 nanotube arrays; Methyl orange; Photocurrent; Photocatalytic property

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91023030, 51272062, 51128201, 51202052]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province [1308085QE74]
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20100111110012]
  4. International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Project of Anhui Province [10080703017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitrogen doped TiO2 nanotube arrays (N-TNAs) were prepared by immersing TNAs in 1 M NH3 center dot H2O solution and then annealing in different temperatures. The morphology, structure and composition of the N-TNAs were characterized by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and UV-vis spectroscopy, respectively. Effects of annealing temperatures on structure, photocatalytic properties, and the crystal structure transformation process of the N-TNAs were discussed. Photocatalytic properties of the N-TNAs were evaluated in term of the degradation of methyl orange (MO) under UV light and visible light, and the photocurrent of N-TNAs were tested by electrochemical workstation. The XPS results showed that the N-TNAs were achieved by interstitial doping and substitutional doping, and the FESEM results showed the morphology was not changed after doping process. Compared with the pure TNAs, the N-TNAs annealed at 500 degrees C for 2 h with a mixed phase of anatase and rutile exhibited higher photocatalytic degradation activity to MO. Furthermore, the photocatalytic mechanism of organic pollutants degradation (MO) was discussed based on our experiments. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据