4.5 Article

Resistance to the orexigenic effect of ghrelin in dietary-induced obesity in mice: reversal upon weight loss

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY
卷 28, 期 7, 页码 879-885

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802640

关键词

ghrelin; food intake; peripheral; high fat

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Ghrelin, an endogenous ligand for growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHS-R), is known to increase food intake in lean humans and rodents. In addition, ghrelin levels are increased by fasting in lean rodents and are elevated before meals in humans, suggesting an important role for ghrelin in meal initiation. However, in obese human, circulating ghrelin levels were found to be significantly reduced as compared to lean individuals. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether circulating ghrelin levels, as well as ghrelin sensitivity, are decreased in obese individuals in order to limit its effect on food intake. DESIGN: Lean C57BL/6J mice fed a chow, a low- (LFD) or a high-fat diet (HFD) were used to determine ghrelin regulation and secretion as well as ghrelin sensitivity. MEASUREMENTS: Plasma ghrelin levels were measured in low- and high-fat fed mice. Ghrelin-induced food intake was measured in chow, low- and high-fat fed mice. RESULTS: We measured ghrelin levels in lean and diet-induced obese mice, fed on an LFD or an HFD, respectively. We observed that not only ghrelin secretion was reduced in obese mice but its diurnal regulation was also lost. In addition, we failed to observe any change in ghrelin secretion upon fasting and refeeding. Moreover, we observed that the sensitivity to the orexigenic effects of exogenous ghrelin was reduced in obese mice when compared to lean mice fed a chow or a LFD. The insensitivity of obese mice to ghrelin was improved upon weigh loss. CONCLUSION: Altogether, these results indicate that ghrelin secretion and regulation is impaired in dietary-induced obesity in mice and suggest that ghrelin inhibition could prevent weight regain after weight loss.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据