4.7 Article

Epidemiological and clinical study of sporadic acute hepatitis E caused by indigenous strains of hepatitis E virus in Japan compared with acute hepatitis A

期刊

JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 39, 期 7, 页码 640-648

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s00535-003-1359-5

关键词

acute hepatitis E; epidemiology; hepatitis A; phylogenetic analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background We compared acute hepatitis E (AH-E) and acute hepatitis A (AH-A) to investigate the epidemiology, clinical features, and prognosis of AH-E caused by an indigenous hepatitis E virus (HEV) in Japan. Methods. We enrolled 58 patients diagnosed with AH-A or AH-E (32 men and 26 women; age, 20-72 years) from December 1997 to October 2002. Phylogenetic analysis of the partial 412-nucleotide sequence of open reading frame (ORF) 2 was performed in patients with AH-E. Results. Regarding the geographic distribution of the HEV genotype, genotype III was principally distributed in Honshu Island, and genotype IV in Hokkaido Island (P = 0.0034). The phylogenetic analysis of the ORF2 region revealed that there were significant geographic differences in the distribution of the HEV strains in Japan, with some strains being widespread and some, localized. In comparison with AH-A patients, those with AH-E were older (56.1 +/- 10.6 vs 45.9 +/- 10.8 years; P = 0.0017). The proportion of males among patients with AH-E was significantly higher (P = 0.0001). Pyrexia was often observed in AH-A, and malaise in AH-E. Laboratory data indicate that AH-E induces a weak immunological reaction, whereas jaundice appears earlier in AH-E than in AH-A. One patient with AH-E died of acute hepatic failure, but none of those with AH-A died during the study period. Conclusions. Our results suggest that there are geographical differences between HEV strains in Japan, and that AH-E is more common in males and older patients than AH-A. Laboratory data indicate a weak immunological reaction and early appearance of jaundice in AH-E.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据