4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

A wide-range model for simulation of pump-probe experiments with metals

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 258, 期 23, 页码 9480-9483

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.07.017

关键词

Laser-metal interaction; Pump-probe experiment; Phase shift; Transport properties

资金

  1. Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences (programs of basic researches)
  2. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  3. Russian Academy of Sciences [21276]
  4. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [09-08-01129, 11-02-91058-CNRS, 11-02-01457]
  5. Council of the President of the Russian Federation for Support of Young Russian Scientists and Leading Scientific Schools [NSh-65792.2010.2]
  6. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (the Federal targeted program Scientific and scientific-pedagogical personnel of the innovative Russia)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High precision pump-probe experiments can provide a valuable information about material states out of equilibrium. A wide-range numerical model is used for the description of material response on ultrashort laser action. The model is developed on the basis of two-temperature hydrodynamics with heat transport, ionization, plasma expansion, electron-ion collisions and two-temperature equation of state for an irradiated substance. Comparison of experimental findings with the results of simulation is used both for the numerical model verification and for calculation of plasma thermodynamic parameters that cannot be measured directly in experiment. An aluminum target is heated by an intense 400 nm (2 omega) pump laser pulse that is incident normal to the planar target. Weak S- and P-polarized probe pulses with wavelength 800 nm (1 omega) are used for diagnostics of the plasma. Both probe pulses illuminate the target at a 45 degrees angle. Calculation of the reflectivity and phase shift of probe pulses with both polarizations are in good agreement with experiment. (c) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据