4.7 Article

Bioactive glass-ceramic coating for enhancing the in vitro corrosion resistance of biodegradable Mg alloy

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 259, 期 -, 页码 799-805

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.07.127

关键词

Magnesium alloy; Glass-ceramic coating; Corrosion resistance; Biomaterials

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51072129]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin [11 JCYBJC02600]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, a bioactive 45S5 glass-ceramic coating was synthesized on magnesium (Mg) alloy substrate by using a sol-gel dip-coating method, to improve the initial corrosion resistance of AZ31 Mg alloy. The surface morphology and phase composition of the glass-ceramic coating were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The coating composed of amorphous phase and crystalline phase Na2Ca2Si3O9, with the thickness of similar to 1.0 mu m, exhibited a uniform and crack-free surface morphology. The corrosion behavior of the uncoated and coated Mg alloy substrates was investigated by the electrochemical measurements and immersion tests in simulated body fluid (SBF). Potentiodynamic polarization tests recorded an increase of potential (E-corr) form -1.60 V to -1.48 V, and a reduction of corrosion current density (i(corr)) from 4.48 mu A cm(-2) to 0.16 mu A cm(-2), due to the protection provided by the glass-ceramic coating. Immersion tests also showed the markedly improved corrosion resistance of the coated sample over the immersion period of 7 days. Moreover, after 14 days of immersion in SBF, the corrosion resistance of the coated sample declined due to the cracking of the glass-ceramic coating, which was confirmed by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) analysis. The results suggested that the 45S5 glass-ceramic coated Mg alloy could provide a suitable corrosion behavior for use as degradable implants. (C) 2012 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据