4.6 Article

Changes in renal function in patients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy treated with orthotopic liver transplantation

期刊

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
卷 19, 期 7, 页码 1779-1785

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfh063

关键词

amylosis; familial amyloid polyneuropathy; liver transplantation; renal failure; survival

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP) is an autosomal dominant disease caused by a point mutation in the gene encoding transthyretin, which is secreted by the liver. Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has been proposed to prevent disease progression. Little is known about long-term changes in renal function and lesions after OLT. Methods. The renal function of 33 patients with FAP was evaluated (proteinuria, serum creatinine, creatinine clearance) before OLT and over a period of at least 5 years afterwards. A pre-transplantation renal biopsy was performed in 14 patients and a follow-up biopsy in eight patients. Results. Before transplantation, mean serum creatinine concentration was 86 mumol/l (47-126 mumol/l) and creatinine clearance was 71.9 +/- 31.6 ml/min/1.73 m(2). Proteinuria was detected in 54% of patients (0.3-4 g/day). Pre-transplant renal biopsies (n = 14) revealed glomerular, tubular and vascular amyloid deposits in 90, 58 and 66% of patients, respectively. Eleven patients (33%) died after OLT. Death occurred most frequently in patients having weight losses >7 kg (P < 0.05). After transplantation, 25 patients (76%) suffered acute renal failure but only one required dialysis. One month after transplantation, the mean serum creatinine concentration was 134.1 +/- 73 mumol/l and remained constant during follow-up. Eight patients underwent a second renal biopsy 2 years after transplantation. No significant changes in deposits or renal toxicity due to calcineurin inhibitors were detected. Conclusion. Although liver transplantation in FAP does not affect existing renal amyloid deposits, it prevents the progression of renal disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据