4.4 Article

Transcriptional responses of intestinal epithelial cells to infection with Vibrio cholerae

期刊

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
卷 72, 期 7, 页码 4240-4248

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.72.7.4240-4248.2004

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA 98450, CA 95323, U01 CA085069, CA 85069, R01 CA001808, CA 01808, R01 CA077057, R01 CA095323, CA 77057, R21 CA098450] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI 19716, R01 AI019716] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vibrio cholerae is a noninvasive enteric bacterium that causes the severe diarrheal disease cholera. Candidate cholera vaccines have been engineered by deleting genes encoding known virulence factors in V. cholerae; however, many of these attenuated strains were still reactogenic in human volunteers. In this study, DNA arrays were utilized to monitor the transcriptional responses of human intestinal epithelial cells (T84) to eight strains of V. cholerae, including attenuated, toxigenic, and environmental isolates. cDNA probes generated from host RNA samples were hybridized against low- and high-density gene arrays. V. cholerae induced the transcription of a variety of host genes and repressed the expression of a lower number of genes. Expression patterns were confirmed for certain genes by reverse transcriptase PCR and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. A core subset of genes was found to be differentially regulated in all experiments. These genes included genes involved in innate mucosal immunity, intracellular signaling, and cellular proliferation. Reactogenic vaccine strains induced greater expression of genes for certain proinflammatory cytokines than nonreactogenic strains. Wild-type and attenuated derivatives induced and repressed many genes in common, although there were differences in the transcription profiles. These results indicate that the types of host genes modulated by attenuated V. cholerae, and the extent of their induction, may mediate the symptoms seen with reactogenic cholera vaccine strains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据