4.6 Article

Perinatal factors and development of islet autoimmunity in early childhood - The diabetes autoimmunity study in the young

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 160, 期 1, 页码 3-10

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwh159

关键词

autoimmunity; child; diabetes mellitus; type I; environment; infant; newborn; perinatal care; pregnancy; prospective studies

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [P30 DK 57516, DK-32493, DK-32083] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study was to test whether maternal age at delivery, child's birth order, cesarean section, complicated delivery, maternal smoking during pregnancy, or neonatal jaundice predict islet autoimmunity in children at genetically increased risk of type 1 diabetes in a birth cohort with blood draws at ages 9, 15, and 24 months and yearly thereafter. Newborns with diabetes-associated human leukocyte antigen genotypes (n = 938) and offspring or siblings of persons with type 1 diabetes (n = 428) from the Denver, Colorado, metropolitan area were examined from January 1994 to February 2003. Information on perinatal factors was collected by using questionnaires soon after the birth. Islet autoimmunity was defined as positivity for greater than or equal to1 autoantibody to glutamic acid decarboxylase(65), insulin, or protein tyrosine phosphatase-2/ICA512 at greater than or equal to2 consecutive visits (n = 52; mean follow-up, 3.9 years). Complicated delivery (breech, forceps, vacuum extraction) predicted a higher risk of islet autoimmunity (hazard ratio = 2.10, 95% confidence interval: 1.09, 4.05). Increasing maternal age was related to risk of islet autoimmunity among first-degree relatives of persons with type 1 diabetes (hazard ratios = 3.96 and 8.88 for maternal ages 25-34 and greater than or equal to35 years, respectively, compared with <25 years; p for trend = 0.008. Other factors evaluated were not related to risk of islet autoimmunity. In conclusion, influences in utero or during delivery may affect the fetal immune system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据