4.4 Article

Statistical wavelet-based method for structural health monitoring

期刊

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
卷 130, 期 7, 页码 1055-1062

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:7(1055)

关键词

vibration analysis; damage assessment; decomposition; statistical analysis; structural reliability; monitoring

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A statistical pattern classification method based on wavelet packet transform (WPT) is developed in this study for structural health monitoring. The core of this method is the WPT that has the ability of extracting minute abnormality from vibration signals. The vibration signals of a structure excited by a pulse load are first decomposed into wavelet packet components. Signal energies of these wavelet packet components are then calculated and sorted according to their magnitudes. Those components that are small in signal energy are discarded since they are easily contaminated by measurement noise. The remaining dominant component energies are defined as a novel condition index. the wavelet packet signature (WPS). Two damage indicators are then formulated to lump the discriminate information from the extracted WPS. Thresholds for damage alarming are established using the statistical properties and the one-sided confidence limit of the damage indicators from successive measurements. For demonstration, an experimental study on the health monitoring of a steel cantilever I beam is performed. Four damage cases, involving line cuts of different severities in the flanges at one cross section, are introduced. The vibration signals are obtained from an accelerometer installed at the free end of the beam. Results show that the health condition of the beam can be accurately monitored by the proposed method even when the signals are highly contaminated with noise. The proposed method does not require any prior knowledge of the structure being monitored and is very suitable for on-line continuous monitoring of structural health condition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据