4.4 Article

Impaired exercise performance in the heat is associated with an anticipatory reduction in skeletal muscle recruitment

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00424-004-1267-4

关键词

exercise; heat; fatigue; brain; electromyography; cycling time-trial; thermoregulation; teleoanticipation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exercise in the heat causes central fatigue, associated with reduced skeletal muscle recruitment during sustained isometric contractions. A similar mechanism may cause fatigue during prolonged dynamic exercise in the heat. The aim of this study was to determine whether centrally regulated skeletal muscle recruitment was altered during dynamic exercise in hot (35degreesC) compared with cool (15degreesC) environments. Ten male subjects performed two self-paced, 20-km cycling time-trials, one at 35degreesC (HOT condition) and one at 15degreesC (COOL condition). Rectal temperature rose significantly in both conditions, reaching maximum values at 20 km of 39.2+/-0.2degreesC in HOT and 38.8+/-0.1degreesC in COOL (P<0.005 HOT vs. COOL). Core temperatures at all other distances were not different between conditions. Power output and integrated electromyographic activity (iEMG) of the quadriceps muscle began to decrease early in the HOT trial, when core temperatures, heart rates and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were similar in both conditions. iEMG was significantly lower in HOT than in COOL at 10 and 20 km, while power output was significantly reduced in the period from 80% to 100% of the trial duration in the HOT compared with COOL condition. Thus, reduced power output and iEMG activity during self-paced exercise in the heat occurs before there is any abnormal increase in rectal temperature, heart rate or perception of effort. This adaptation appears to form part of an anticipatory response which adjusts muscle recruitment and power output to reduce heat production, thereby ensuring that thermal homeostasis is maintained during exercise in the heat.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据